Decisions

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse access to the record concerned was justified under section 23(1)(b) of the FOI Act and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's decision

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's refusal of the remaining records under section 28(1) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator found that the Hospital was justified in its refusal of records on the ground that such records do not exist or cannot be found and that section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act applies.

The Commissioner found that the HSE was not justified in its decision to refuse access to all of the records. She found that those parts of the records which did not disclose the personal information of persons other than the deceased fell to be released in accordance with Article 4(1)(b)(i) of the FOI Act, 1997 (Section 28(6)) Regulations, 2009. She found that those parts of the records which disclosed the personal information of persons other than the deceased were exempt under section 28(1). Accordingly, she varied the decision of the HSE and directed that parts of the records be released.

The Senior Investigator found that the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to the records sought in accordance with the provisions of sections 6(4) and 20 of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the Department.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's refusal of the records at issue under section 24(2)(e) of the FOI Act.

he Senior Investigator affirmed the Board's refusal of the records at issue under section 10(1)(c) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's refusal of the records at issue under sections 19(1)(a), (b), and (c) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the HSE's refusal of the remaining details at issue under sections 28(1) and 28(5B) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the decision of the Department to refuse access to the records containing security footage of the applicant's booked visits to Mountjoy Prison on certain specified dates, pursuant to the provisions of Section 28(5B) and 23(1)(a)(iii) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator annulled the decision of the Department and directed the release of the records concerned.

The Senior Investigator found that the Council was justified in its decision to refuse access to certain records on the basis of sections 10(1)(a), 22(1)(a) and 28(1) of the FOI Acts.

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse access to the record concerned was justified under section 21(1)(a) of the FOI Act in the particular circumstances of this case and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Commissioner varied the decision of the Department by affirming it in part and annulling it in part. She found that the database was exempt in large part under sections 23(1)(c) and 27(1)(b) of the FOI Act. However, she directed the release of the aggregate or composite maps in the database and also of the individual maps of the third party service providers who consented to the release of their information that is contained in the database.

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse to grant the applicant's request was justified under section 10(1)(b) of the FOI Act and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the CRS's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator annulled the IDA's refusal of the details at issue and directed that they be released.

The Information Commissioner affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision. He found that (1) the identified records should be released in full and (2) the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to additional records under section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the basis that no such records exist.

The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to additional records on the basis of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse access to the record concerned was justified under section 22(1)(b) of the FOI Act and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Senior Investigator found that the Council had satisfied its obligations on the provision of a statement of reasons under section 18 of the FOI Act. He affirmed the Council's decision.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision

The Senior Investigator found that the HSE is justified in its decision to refuse access to the records on the basis of section 28(1). He affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to the record sought in accordance with the provisions of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act. He affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse access to the records concerned was justified under sections 22(1)(a) and 28 of the FOI Act and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's refusal of the requests under section 10(1)(e) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Council's refusal of the requests under section 10(1)(e) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator found that no basis for amendment of the record of allegations had been demonstrated by the applicant and affirmed the decision of the HSE accordingly.

The Senior Investigator found that the statement of reasons provided by the Department complied with the provisions of section 18 of the FOI Act. He affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator annulled the Department's decision and directed that the two records be released in full.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator varied the Department's decision. He found that (1) the identified records should be released in full and (2) the Department was justified in its decision to refuse access to additional records under section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the basis that no such records exist.

The Senior Investigator found that the HSE was justified in its decision to refuse access to additional records on the basis of section 10(1)(a) of the FOI Act.

The Senior Investigator affirmed the Department's decision.

The Senior Investigator found that the HSE is justified in its decision to refuse access to the records on the basis of section 28(1). He affirmed the decision of the HSE.

The Senior Investigator found that the decision to refuse access to the record concerned was justified under section 22(1)(b) of the FOI Act and affirmed the decision accordingly.

The Senior Investigator found that the Council had satisfied its obligations on the provision of a statement of reasons under section 18 of the FOI Act. He affirmed the Council's decision.